Perricone v. Perricone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that completely integrated agreement did not nullify restrictions in prior agreement that it did not “mention[], cover[], or deal[] with”
• holding that a confidentiality agreement constitutes a valid waiver of First Amendment rights, even in the absence of any express reference to the First Amendment
• holding that completely integrated agreement did not nullify restrictions in prior agreement that it did not “mention[], cover[], or deal[] with”
• concluding after Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., supra, that such provisions are not subject to strict scrutiny and will be upheld if they amount to a voluntary and knowing waiver of First Amendment rights
• affirming that Golding doctrine applies to civil as well as criminal cases
• affirming a preliminary injunction to enforce a non–disparagement clause contained within a confidentiality agreement which forbid defamatory or disparaging statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).