Perreault v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although it is not necessary to instruct the jury on the specific offense which the defendant intended to commit within the structure, it is necessary for the jury to find that the defendant entered the premises to commit an offense therein.”
• “Although it is not necessary to instruct the jury on the specific offense which the defendant intended to commit within the structure, it is necessary for the jury to find that the defendant entered the premises to commit an offense therein.”
• “Although it is not necessary to instruct the jury on the specific offense which the defendant intended to commit within the structure, it is necessary for the jury to find that the defendant entered the premises to commit an offense therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Allen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-18· cited 3×
• Rodney L. Long Jr. v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-04· cited 1×
• Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 06-249 re Allen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-18· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rozier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-19· cited 25×
• Ellis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-19· cited 14×
• Puskac v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-12· cited 8×
• Barton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 4×
• Croft v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-27· cited 4×
• State v. Silva
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-24· cited 1×