Perozeni v. Perozeni
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 185
Syllabus
App.R. 16; App.R. 12; marital property; separate property; clerical errors. Trial court's finding that the marital residence was wholly marital property was supported by clear and convincing evidence where the sole evidence of a gift was appellant's testimony and there was contradictory testimony that appellant paid consideration for the property in the past. Accordingly, the trial court's decision was not an abuse of discretion. Although the trial court's entry designates appellee as the health insurance obligor, a clerical error in the entry suggests appellant is responsible; accordingly, the case is remanded for the trial court to correct its entry. The court of appeals may disregard any assignment of error where the party fails to comply with App.R. 16. Where assigned errors are not supported by citations to legal authority, the brief is out of compliance with the rule.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.