Peroli v. Medina Cty. Prosecutor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the NLRA “does not permit the district court to exercise jurisdiction over the decision of the General Counsel of the NLRB to issue an unfair labor practice complaint”
• holding that if a statute is silent as to the matter at issue, Agency’s attempt at filling the gap “will generally be sustained as long as it reflects a permissible construction of the statute”
• holding that a federal court has no authority to review a decision of the NLRB's General Counsel dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint pursuant to an informal settlement in which the charging party refused to join
• stating that courts owe deference to agency interpretation \as long as [ ] interpretation is rational and consistent with statute\
• explaining that Chevron deference to agency interpretations of statutes applies only to regulations “promulgated pursuant to congressional authority”
• explaining that Chevron deference to agency interpretations of statutes applies only to regulations \promulgated pursuant to congressional authority\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).