Skip to main content
· 2/28/2002

Pero v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Citations

  • 46 P.3d 484
  • 2002 Colo. App. LEXIS 258
  • 2002 WL 287645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering testimony “that ‘the biggest motivation’ for the [employer’s] payment was to provide ‘a decent cushion’ to displaced employees” in upholding finding that payment was disqualifying severance pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogt, Marquez, Taubman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.