· 2/28/2002
Pero v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Citations
- 46 P.3d 484
- 2002 Colo. App. LEXIS 258
- 2002 WL 287645
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering testimony “that ‘the biggest motivation’ for the [employer’s] payment was to provide ‘a decent cushion’ to displaced employees” in upholding finding that payment was disqualifying severance pay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vogt, Marquez, Taubman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.