Permanent Financial Corp. v. Taro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that former Rule BD1 “implicitly acknowledge[d]” certain limits to the doctrine of lis pendens, in part because the rule included a cross-reference to a property law treatise that espoused those limits
• concluding that former Rule BD1 “implicitly acknowledge[d]” certain limits to the doctrine of lis pendens, in part because the rule included a cross-reference to a property law treatise that espoused those limits
• supporting lis pendens only where the action “affects title” to real property
• the doctrine of lis pendens, as applied in Maryland, will operate against only real or leasehold property that is located in Maryland and is the subject of an action pending in Maryland

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).