Perlman v. Abel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellants, paternal grandparents of the child who was the child of the appellee and the appellants’ deceased son, had a right to notice under § 9-9-912(g), but not the right to present evidence on whether the adoption would be in the child’s best interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).