Perl v. Smith Barney Inc.
Citations
- 230 A.D.2d 664
- 646 N.Y.S.2d 678
- 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no fiduciary duty governing broker/client relationship where broker allegedly overcharged fees in connection with nondisere-tionary brokerage account (internal quotation marks omitted)
- dismissing fiduciary-duty claim because allegations in the complaint did not “purport to assert a relationship different from that of an ordinary broker-client relationship”
- dismissing complaint because plaintiff “made no effort to rebut [defendant’s] showing . . . that plaintiff failed to object in writing within ten days of the imposition of the [fee]” as was required under the parties’ contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellerin, Nardelli, Ross, Sullivan, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fesseha v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-05-20· cited 88×
- SNS Bank v. CitibankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-05-13· cited 78×
- William Kaufman Organization, Ltd. v. Graham & James L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-08· cited 72×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,286 Raizy Levitin v. Painewebber, Inc.Second Circuit· 1998-09-29· cited 70×
- Independent Order of Foresters v. Donald, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.Second Circuit· 1998-10-07· cited 52×
- Granite Partners, L.P. v. Bear, Stearns & Co.S.D. New York· 1999-07-26· cited 40×
- Brasseur v. SperanzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-08-18· cited 37×
- Press v. Chemical Investment Services Corp.Second Circuit· 1999-02-04· cited 29×
- Mosaic Caribe, Ltd. v. AllSettled Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-05-01· cited 22×
- Vannest v. Sage, Rutty & Co., Inc.W.D. New York· 1997-03-31· cited 17×
- Press v. Chemical Investment Services Corp.S.D. New York· 1997-12-22· cited 14×
- Weinberg v. MendelowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-01-16· cited 11×
- Yang v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-04-12· cited 10×
- Liberman v. WordenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-01-20· cited 8×
- Jordan v. UBS AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-10-14· cited 7×
- The Independent Order Of Foresters v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.Second Circuit· 1998-10-07· cited 6×
- Carco Group, Inc. v. MacOnachyE.D. New York· 2009-04-21· cited 3×
- Kirschner v. BennettS.D. New York· 2010-12-13· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1999-02-04
- Mory v. Wells Fargo Mtge. Subpoena Dept.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 2019-08-09
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ullmann v. Norma Kamali, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-09-15· cited 27×
- David Fanarof, Inc. v. Dember Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-07-13· cited 18×
- Fekety v. Gruntal & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-03-25· cited 10×
- Dietrich v. Chemical BankNew York Supreme Court· 1981-09-21· cited 6×
- Gephardt v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-03-09· cited 5×
- Dietrich v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-03-08· cited 4×
- Talbi v. ZCWK AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-01-16· cited 2×
- Congress Talcott Corp. v. Damino Accessories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-10-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.