Perks v. McCracken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing habeas petition as time barred where Petitioner had not “shown any extraordinary or severe obstacle that prevented him from timely filing” his petition
• “Because Petitioner filed his 440 Motion on April 29, 2010, well after the one year grace period had expired on April 24, 1997, he cannot avail himself of statutory tolling.” (citing Plato v. Morrissey, 638 F. Supp. 2d 338, 345 (W.D.N.Y. 2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).