Perkins v. Val D'Aosta Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a question of fact remained where plaintiffs presented evidence that the step down from the curb was difficult to see when approached from above due to lighting conditions, darkened surfaces and lack of warning
• poor lighting, darkened surfaces, and lack of warning raised a factual question about whether the plaintiff should have seen the curb over which he tripped
• owner charged with knowledge of the lighting conditions, the curb’s height in relation to parking lot, the view of curb for someone descending stairs, and the absence of any paint or warning signs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).