· 11/9/1989
Perkins v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Perkins)
Citations
- 106 B.R. 863
- 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1957
- 1989 WL 135153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court “not prepared to say” that 29-day delay between new transaction and satisfaction of old mortgage was permissible
- certain mortgages, not satisfied within 29 days, remained of record for more than a year after the new transaction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David A. Scholl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.