Skip to main content
· 11/9/1989

Perkins v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Perkins)

Citations

  • 106 B.R. 863
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1957
  • 1989 WL 135153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court “not prepared to say” that 29-day delay between new transaction and satisfaction of old mortgage was permissible
  • certain mortgages, not satisfied within 29 days, remained of record for more than a year after the new transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David A. Scholl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.