Skip to main content
· 1/19/1995

Perkins v. District Government Employees Federal Credit Union

Citations

  • 653 A.2d 842
  • 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 511
  • 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 25
  • 1995 WL 54409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that language stating that employer “in [its] discretion . . . may” take certain actions was insufficient to conclude that the parties intended to create a contract
  • upholding grant of summary judgment on grounds that, as a matter of law, employment relationship was terminable at will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry, Farrell, Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.