Perkins v. B & W CONTRACTORS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that amendments to restrictive covenants were valid even though they were filed before expiration of original period, because the amendments were not effective until the original period had expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brier Lake, Inc. v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-04-14· cited 24×
• Schneider v. Drake
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-07-19· cited 21×
• Cecala v. Thorley
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1988-11-18· cited 5×
• Boyles v. Hausmann
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-12-21· cited 4×
• Hudson v. Morrison Heights Baptist Church
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2001-04-05· cited 3×
• Johnnie Ruth Hudson v. Morrison Heights Baptist Church
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-10-04
• THAD DEVIER AND DE VIER CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. Robert
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2009-03-27
• Perkins v. B & W Contractors, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-10-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bruce v. Simonson Investments, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1968-02-19· cited 14×
• Coe v. ITT Community Development Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-07-29· cited 3×

Other cases named Perkins v. B & W CONTRACTORS, INC.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Perkins v. B & W Contractors, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1983-10-11
• Perkins v. B & W Contractors, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-12-16