Skip to main content
· 7/6/1912

Perkins v. Alfred Weston & Co.

Citations

  • 87 Kan. 557
  • 125 P. 83
  • 1912 Kan. LEXIS 195

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>City Ordinance — Vacation of Street — Acquiescence—Estoppel. Where two parties have in succession secured from a city the benefits of ordinances vacating parts of the same street, upon the same terms, and each has erected a warehouse upon his own lot extending upon ground within the limits of the vacated street, and they have entered into a contract with each other respecting a right of way for one of the parties over the property of the other, in lieu of rights formerly enjoyed in the street, the remedy of one of the parties for an obstruction of the way so granted is an enforcement of the contract, and not an annulment of the ordinance vacating that part of the street.</p>

Judges: Benson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.