Skip to main content
· 3/17/2003

Perkasie Borough Authority v. Hilltown Township Water & Sewer Authority

Citations

  • 819 A.2d 597
  • 2003 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \an indispensable party is one whose rights are so connected with the claims of the litigants that no relief can be granted without infringing upon those rights\
  • holding that “an indispensable party is one whose rights are so connected with the claims of the litigants that no relief can be granted without infringing upon those rights”
  • holding that in dispute involving agreement between township and water authority, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection was not an indispensable party where there was no claim raised against it and its involvement in implementation of agreement was \minimal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith-Ribner, Pellegrini, Flaherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.