Skip to main content
· 1/7/1992

Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima County

Citations

  • 825 P.2d 1
  • 170 Ariz. 380
  • 104 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “last preceding” election means last election preceding filing of petition even if election falls after petition is applied for and signatures gathered
  • noting that issue was not addressed directly, but that erroneous advice from county elections director about referendum signatures did not excuse noncompliance
  • noting that issue was not addressed directly, but that erroneous advice from county elections director about referendum signatures did not excuse noncompliance
  • holding referendum would not appear on ballot for failure to comply with signature requirement
  • holding referendum would not appear on ballot for failure to comply with signature requirement
  • holding referendum would not appear on ballot for failure to comply with signature requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruth v. McGregor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.