Performance Food Group, Inc., v. Davis.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the “circuit split” on the use of “prior pay as an affirmative defense to a prima facie EPA claim”
• setting forth EPA’s four exceptions for wage differential, which 2 19-56396 operate as affirmative defenses
• “[W]e conclude that the fourth affirmative defense comprises only job- related factors, not sex.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).