· 3/23/2010
Performance Contracting, Inc. v. Rapid Response Construction, Inc.
Citations
- 267 F.R.D. 422
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As a general matter, it is improper for a party to raise new arguments in a reply brief because it deprives the opposing party of an opportunity to respond to them, and courts may disregard any such arguments.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.