Skip to main content
· 7/12/2013

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V.

Citations

  • 962 F. Supp. 2d 1146
  • 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2123
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98608
  • 2013 WL 3668818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, in an analysis under 23(b)(3), that “[c]lass action certifications to enforce compliance with consumer protection laws are ‘desirable and should be encouraged’ ”
  • collecting cases certifying classes based on defendants’ use of standardized contract language or form letters
  • sua sponte declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law counterclaims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alsup

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.