Perez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court erred by instructing the jury that “comparably serious misconduct was by itself enough to make employees similarly situated”
• finding that the district court erred by instructing the jury that “comparably serious misconduct was by itself enough to make employees similarly situated”
• “We . . . have explained consistently that for employees to be similarly situated those employees’ circumstances, including their misconduct, must have been ‘nearly identical.’”
• discussing McDonnell Douglas comparator requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).