Perez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “On appeal, we review a trial court’s limitation of cross-examination for an abuse of discretion.”
• “[C]ross-examination is ‘especially necessary’ when the witness being cross-examined is the State’s key witness, upon whom the credibility of the State’s cáse depends”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gormady v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-20· cited 1×
• Carlos Couto v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Britt v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 727×
• Steinhorst v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 391×
• Coco v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-01-20· cited 73×
• Tomengo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-09· cited 20×
• Docekal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-02· cited 16×
• Bertram v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-06· cited 12×
• Pace v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-26· cited 9×
• Russo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-01· cited 5×