Skip to main content

Perez v. State

Citations

  • 689 So. 2d 306
  • 1997 WL 20515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that it is “highly improper to interject even a reference to, let alone an accusation of racism which is neither justified by the evidence nor relevant to the issues”
  • reversal required where a prosecutor characterized defendants as engaging in conduct that was \divided along racial lines\
  • \[I]t is always wrong to call ... defendants names by citing them as examples of a criminal `type.'\
  • “Because our system treats persons on their own individual merits, it is always wrong to call witnesses or defendants names by citing them as examples of a criminal ‘type.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Nesbitt and Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.