Skip to main content
· 11/15/1985

Perez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Citations

  • 622 F. Supp. 734
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because there were no contingency clauses in the purchase agreements “[e]ven had the [defendants] received the appraisal “about the time I was working on my assessment appeal.”
  • granting the plaintiff's motion to amend the appellate record to add a notice of appeal and denying the defendant's motion to dismiss
  • “The original record on appeal contained no notice of appeal[.] However, . . . the . . . [p]laintiffs moved to amend the record on appeal pursuant to Rules 9(b)(5
  • “The original record on appeal contained no notice of appeal[.] However, . . . the . . . [p]laintiffs moved to amend the record on appeal pursuant to Rules 9(b)(5
  • analyzing appraiser negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims together

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laffitte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.