Perez v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that theory that husband had a present ability to pay an order by obtaining a loan from relatives was “outrageous”
• finding general master's finding of present ability to pay based on spouse's ability to obtain a loan \outrageous\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ugarte v. Ugarte
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-22· cited 28×
• Sibley v. Sibley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-23· cited 14×
• Breitenbach v. Breitenbach
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-14· cited 6×
• Pino v. Felton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-10· cited 6×
• Wendel v. Wendel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02· cited 1×
• Stephen Tressel v. Lucia Gatta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-13
• Jonathan Scott Nation v. Brittany Gene Boling
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-08
• Tribue v. Langston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-14
• Senterfitt v. Oaks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-17
• Del Campo v. Spears
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-30
• Erickson v. Erickson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-11

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowen v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-20· cited 319×
• Russell v. Russell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-03· cited 13×
• Knowles v. Knowles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-17· cited 12×
• Scapin v. Scapin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-04· cited 5×