Perez v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing where awarding the husband’s $50,000 share of the equity in the marital home as lump-sum alimony resulted in the wife retaining 82% of the parties’ assets
• \The court may make such other modifications in the judgment as may be appropriate in light of this ruling.\
• “The court may make such other modifications in the judgment as may be appropriate in light of this ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Broemer v. Broemer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-06· cited 22×
• Rosario v. Rosario
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-27· cited 9×
• Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-02· cited 4×
• Russell v. Russell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-15· cited 2×
• Taylor v. Taylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-24

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Feger v. Feger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-23· cited 18×
• Longo v. Longo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-21· cited 15×
• Cruz v. Cruz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-26· cited 12×
• Satanonchai v. Satanonchai
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-04-05· cited 10×
• Henning v. Henning
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-12· cited 9×
• Castillo v. Castillo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-09· cited 6×
• Argento v. Argento
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 6×
• Bonilla v. Bonilla
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-11· cited 2×
• Spenceley v. Spenceley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-24· cited 2×