Perez v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a temporary order requiring the husband to pay approximately 86% of his net monthly income in temporary support and other financial obligations constituted an abuse of discretion
• reversing award that consumed 86% of husband’s net income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crick v. Crick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-01· cited 15×
• Payton v. Payton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-06· cited 5×
• Aziz v. Aziz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-15· cited 5×
• Cooper v. Cooper
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-19· cited 3×
• Hoffman v. Hoffman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-04

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Hotaling v. Hotaling
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-17· cited 14×
• Bolton v. Bolton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-23· cited 12×
• Vega v. Vega
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-14· cited 10×
• Griffin v. Griffin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 9×
• Dennison v. Dennison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-22· cited 8×
• Hollinger v. Hollinger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11· cited 8×
• Holden v. Holden
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-31· cited 5×
• Gandul v. Gandul
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 4×
• LaSala v. LaSala
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06· cited 4×