Perez v. Omnium Trader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that judicial estoppel “is generally unavailable as to government litigants”
• dismissing § 1983 claim “as to WMATA because it is not a ‘person’ and therefore cannot be sued under the statute”
• “It is difficult to see how [the plaintiff] could be accorded complete 15 relief without [the absent party], the entity that employs and, moreover, pays and makes charge 16 backs to the wages of, members of the putative class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).