Perez v. National Presto Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a manufacturer is not an insurer of its product” because “[a] manufacturer cannot be expected to design products with component parts which will never wear out, regardless of the nature of use or maintenance”
• summary judgment for manufacturer affirmed where evidence showed no design or manufacturing defect, but only that over-pressure safety plug on twenty-three year old pressure cooker simply wore out

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).