Skip to main content
· 5/26/1998

Perez v. Metropolitan Correctional Center Warden

Citations

  • 5 F. Supp. 2d 208
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7802
  • 1998 WL 274281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, on summary judgment, that the district court must “read the pro se party’s supporting papers liberally, and . . . interpret them to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest.” (cleaned up)
  • noting, in the context of a pro se litigant, that “the non-moving party must provide this Court with some basis to believe that his or her version of relevant events is not fanciful.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.