Perez v. Long Is. Concrete Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, under act, SORB “may determine that an offender does not pose a danger or risk of reoffense and relieve him of any further registration requirement”
• explaining that the requirements of procedural due process are “not rigid or hyper[ ]technical”
• “exceptions to registration” under § 178E [f] “do not apply to . . . those convicted of sex offenses involving a child or sexually violent offenses”
• “[t]he statutory classification [of persons as ‘sex offenders’] . . . expressly recognizes that some persons who have committed such offenses in the past will not pose any current danger”
• “A person’s prior criminal record is a legitimate factor to consider in determining whether there is reasonable suspicion for a stop or probable cause for a search or an arrest”
• facial validity of statute does not preclude as applied due process challenges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).