· 8/30/1989
Perez v. Hartmann
Citations
- 543 N.E.2d 1023
- 187 Ill. App. 3d 1098
- 135 Ill. Dec. 455
- 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 1311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming damages for plaintiff where plaintiff alleged that, had physician interpreted his medical test properly, the physician would not have recommended the implantation of a permanent pacemaker, which was subsequently removed
- affirming damages for plaintiff where plaintiff alleged that, had physician interpreted his medical test properly, the physician would not have recommended the implantation of a permanent pacemaker, which was subsequently removed
- affirming damages for plaintiff where plaintiff alleged that, had physician interpreted his medical test properly, the physician would not have recommended the implantation of a permanent pacemaker, which was subsequently removed
- affirming damages for plaintiff where plaintiff alleged that, had physician interpreted his medical test properly, the physician would not have recommended the implantation of a permanent pacemaker, which was subsequently removed
- affirming damages for plaintiff where plaintiff alleged that, had physician interpreted his medical test properly, the physician would not have recommended the implantation of a permanent pacemaker, which was subsequently removed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Freeman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.