Skip to main content
E.D. Missouri· 10/10/2012

Perez v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Citations

  • 902 F. Supp. 2d 1238
  • 2012 WL 4811123
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the emerging trend seems in favor of disallowing pre-service removal”
  • ordering remand where the out- of-state defendant removed the case only six days after plaintiffs filed the complaint and before any defendant was served
  • collecting cases, holding pre service removal is inconsistent with fundamental purposes of 21 removal and forum defendant rule and violates that rule, disagreeing with district court decisions permitting removal
  • collecting cases, holding pre service removal is inconsistent with fundamental purposes of 21 removal and forum defendant rule and violates that rule, disagreeing with district court decisions permitting removal
  • \Pre-service removal by means of monitoring the electronic docket smacks [ ] of forum shopping by a defendant.\
  • “Pre-service removal by means of monitoring the electronic docket smacks [] of forum shopping by a defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.