E.D. Missouri· 10/10/2012
Perez v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.
Citations
- 902 F. Supp. 2d 1238
- 2012 WL 4811123
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the emerging trend seems in favor of disallowing pre-service removal”
- ordering remand where the out- of-state defendant removed the case only six days after plaintiffs filed the complaint and before any defendant was served
- collecting cases, holding pre service removal is inconsistent with fundamental purposes of 21 removal and forum defendant rule and violates that rule, disagreeing with district court decisions permitting removal
- collecting cases, holding pre service removal is inconsistent with fundamental purposes of 21 removal and forum defendant rule and violates that rule, disagreeing with district court decisions permitting removal
- \Pre-service removal by means of monitoring the electronic docket smacks [ ] of forum shopping by a defendant.\
- “Pre-service removal by means of monitoring the electronic docket smacks [] of forum shopping by a defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gentile v. Biogen Idec, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2013-02-21· cited 86×
- Phillips Construction, LLC v. Daniels Law Firm, PLLCS.D. West Virginia· 2015-03-19· cited 31×
- Little v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc.M.D. Tennessee· 2017-05-05· cited 27×
- D.C. v. Abbott Labs. Inc.E.D. Illinois· 2018-08-28· cited 24×
- Estep v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co.N.D. Illinois· 2014-09-15· cited 21×
- Rogers v. Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2014-03-31· cited 12×
- Hensley v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2014-05-14· cited 11×
- Campbell v. Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2013-02-19· cited 8×
- Arrington v. Medtronic, Inc.W.D. Tennessee· 2014-09-02· cited 6×
- Magallan v. Zurich American Insurance Co.N.D. Oklahoma· 2017-01-11· cited 6×
- Dooley v. Medtronic, Inc.W.D. Tennessee· 2014-07-17· cited 3×
- Leech v. 3M Co.E.D. Louisiana· 2017-09-30· cited 3×
- Czapla v. Republic Servs., Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2019-03-13· cited 3×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 12,961×
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 6,547×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court· 2010-02-23· cited 2,766×
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court· 1940-05-27· cited 2,271×
- Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court· 2005-11-29· cited 1,211×
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 632×
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1993-06-18· cited 504×
- Onepoint Solutions, Llc, a Georgia Limited Liability Company v. Michael Borchert William CatuzziEighth Circuit· 2007-05-11· cited 381×
- In Re Business Men's Assurance Company of AmericaEighth Circuit· 1993-04-29· cited 344×
- Prempro Products Liability Litigation v. WyethEighth Circuit· 2010-01-06· cited 335×
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 2006-07-27· cited 262×
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. ElbertSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 152×
- Alvin L. Phipps v. Guaranty Natl. BankEighth Circuit· 2005-07-28· cited 126×
- Irene Hurt v. Dow Chemical Company Rose Exterminator CompanyEighth Circuit· 1992-07-02· cited 112×
- Stephen H. Peters v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyEighth Circuit· 1996-04-01· cited 110×
- Albert Pecherski v. General Motors Corp. And Jane DoeEighth Circuit· 1981-01-13· cited 90×
- Stan Winston Creatures, Inc. v. Toys\ R\ US, Inc.S.D. New York· 2003-04-17· cited 74×
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Underwriters At Lloyd's Of LondonThird Circuit· 1997-02-06· cited 57×
- International Ass'n of Entrepreneurs of America v. AngoffEighth Circuit· 1995-06-30· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.