Perez v. Colorado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an IEP was not adequately individualized where it “was good for [the child]’s expressive language delay problems” but “was inappropriate to address her auditory-processing disorder”
• affirming finding that school district did not provide services in a coordinated and collaborative way where it supplied only a one-page list of tips to its staff on how to work with children with the plaintiff’s condition
• “[A]n IEP must be likely to produce progress, not regression . . . .”
• “educational benefit” one of the most critical factors in assessing an IEP
• “[A]n IEP must be likely to produce progress, not regression . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).