Fifth Circuit· 7/1/2005

Perez v. Barnhart

Citations

415 F.3d 457
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13150
2005 WL 1540802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Without such a showing [that the claimant’s symptoms wax and wane], the claimant’s ability to maintain employment is subsumed in the RFC determination.”
substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla and less than a preponderance”
“Conflicts of evidence are for the Commissioner, not the courts, to resolve.”
“Conflicts of evidence are for the Commissioner, not the courts, to resolve.”
“Conflicts of evidence are for the Commissioner, not the courts, to resolve.”
“The ALJ uses a five- step sequential analysis to evaluate claims of disability: (1) whether the claimant is currently engaged in substantial gainful activity (whether the claimant is working); (2) whether the claimant has a severe impairment; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Demoss, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Perez v. Barnhart

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.