Perez v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Without such a showing [that the claimant’s symptoms wax and wane], the claimant’s ability to maintain employment is subsumed in the RFC determination.”
• substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla and less than a preponderance”
• “Conflicts of evidence are for the Commissioner, not the courts, to resolve.”
• “Conflicts of evidence are for the Commissioner, not the courts, to resolve.”
• “Conflicts of evidence are for the Commissioner, not the courts, to resolve.”
• “The ALJ uses a five- step sequential analysis to evaluate claims of disability: (1) whether the claimant is currently engaged in substantial gainful activity (whether the claimant is working); (2) whether the claimant has a severe impairment; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).