Perez v. Barling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s adoption of the PSR in full provided notice to the defendant
• holding that defendant had notice after district court adopted PSR in full
• stating that the case, fully briefed before Diggles, was “squarely governed” by Diggles
• concluding that the pronouncement-based challenge was ripe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).