Skip to main content
· 7/26/2007

Perez v. Asurion Corp.

Citations

  • 501 F. Supp. 2d 1360
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59515
  • 2006 WL 4700517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that class settlement was not collusive in part because it was overseen by “an experienced and well-respected mediator”
  • noting that about 1.1%, i.e. 118,663 of about 10.3 million 25 Class Members, filed claims
  • approving settlement where 118,663 out of approximately 10.3 million class members submitted claims, for a claim rate of approximately 1.2 percent
  • approving settlement where 1.1% of class members filed claims before the Court issued its decision
  • \The existence of strong defenses to the claims presented makes the possibility of a low recovery quite reasonable.\
  • “The existence of strong defenses to the claims presented makes the possibility of a low recovery quite reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.