Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Perez-Leal v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 313
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 222
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3188
  • 571 U.S. 923
  • 2013 WL 3948691
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[flelon disenfranchisement laws have a long history in the United States,” and that “Congress was no doubt aware of these laws when it enacted the VRA in 1965 and amended it in 1982, yet gave no indication that felon disenfranchisement was in any way suspect”
  • “Out-of-circuit cases are not binding on this Court and therefore do not constitute 14 ‘controlling authority.’”
  • “Felon disenfranchisement laws have a long history in the United States ... predating] the Jim Crow era and, with a few notable exceptions, have not been adopted based on racial considerations,” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.