Perez Hernandez, Laura v. Perez Raices, Darlene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that decisions about how to fight a fire, attack a fire, and allocate fire suppression resources are decisions grounded in public policy
• finding that the discretionary function exception did not apply to the Forest Service's failure to warn property owners of its decision to light a backfire nearby
• holding that a plan requiring the Forest Service to develop a map of private land and record landowners’ contact information was a mere “objective” involving an element of choice because it did not “dictate[] the precise manner in which the agency [was] to complete the challenged task”
• noting that Forest Service’s communication was discretionary but failed to find root in policy
• reversing dismissal of an FTCA claim where the Forest Service allegedly failed to warn plaintiffs of a backfire that the Forest Service started
• “On a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 22 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).