Skip to main content
· 9/24/2010

Pereira v. Astrue

Citations

  • 739 F. Supp. 2d 267
  • 2010 WL 3562058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Plaintiff was entitled to 6.2 hours of work on reply papers performed by Delott
  • finding that 6.2 hours spent on an EAJA reply brief was reasonable and awarding additional fees
  • finding that 6.2 hours spent on an EAJA reply brief was reasonable and awarding additional fees
  • awarding attorney’s fees based on 6.2 attorney hours writing a reply brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurley, Wall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.