Peredo v. M. Holland Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when the minimum-contacts requirement has not been met, it is unnecessary to address the “fair play” portion of the due-process test
• when the minimum-contacts requirement has not been met, it is unnecessary to address the “fair play” portion of the due-process test
• ―[W]e have previously stated that a nonresident does not establish minimum contacts simply by contracting with a Texas entity and engaging in numerous communications, by telephone or otherwise, with people in Texas concerning the contract.‖
• when the minimum-contacts an order denying a special appearance, while an appellate requirement has not been met, it is unnecessary to address the court must consider whether the trial court erred in denying “fair play” portion of the due-process test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).