Skip to main content
· 8/25/1998

Peré Ex Rel. Peré v. Nuovo Pignone, Inc.

Citations

  • 150 F.3d 477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “[t]he district court correctly found that the commercial activity upon which the plaintiff’s cause of action was based was the design and manufacture of turbine systems.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Jones, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.