Perdue v. Perdue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• increase in alimony should be retroactive to the time the petition for modification was filed as former wife's needs and former husband's ability to pay had been continuously present since that time
• increased alimony payments retroactive to the date of filing petition for modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kirkland v. Kirkland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-27· cited 13×
• Witcher v. Petty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-15· cited 9×
• Alford v. Alford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-28· cited 8×
• Barr v. Barr
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-09· cited 5×
• Hodge v. Hodge
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-13· cited 3×
• Hedstrom v. Hedstrom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-18· cited 3×
• Singbush v. Cabrera
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-28· cited 3×
• Olds v. Olds
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-14· cited 2×
• Williams v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-20· cited 1×
• Clarke v. Clarke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-28

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meltzer v. Meltzer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-07· cited 39×
• Fotorny v. Fotorny
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-08· cited 9×