Perdue v. Athens Technical College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a case filed under the GTCA was properly dismissed when the ante-litem notice failed to comply with OCGA § 50-21-26 (a) (5) (E)’s requirement that it state the amount of the loss
• discussing the Supreme Court of Georgia's holdings in Norris and Camp in the context that \[t]he strict compliance requirement does not ... take precedence over the plain language or meaning of the statute\
• dismissing complaint where the claimant’s ante litem notice failed to include any specific dollar amount or range of losses claimed but rather asserted only “economic and noneconomic losses” from a personal injury
• discussing the Supreme Court’s holdings in Norris and Camp in the context that “[t]he strict compliance requirement does not. . . take precedence over the plain language or meaning of the statute”
• discussing the Supreme Court’s holdings in Norris and Camp in the context that “[t]he strict compliance requirement does not . . . take precedence over the plain language or meaning of the statute”
• dismissing complaint where the claimant’s Sikes is not controlling as it addresses statutes other than the GTCA. The GTCA expressly requires a statement of “[t]he amount of the loss claimed.” OCGA § 50-21- 26 (a) (5) (E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).