Skip to main content
· 5/1/1996

Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Hadder

Citations

  • 675 A.2d 577
  • 109 Md. App. 582
  • 43 ERC (BNA) 1538
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evaluating whether a local county zoning boards erred by imposing requirements that inherently conflict with MDE regulations
  • “We believe that the [local] Board’s authority to impose the condition complained of is preempted by state law, because the Board’s conditions would prohibit [nitrogen] spraying in situations in which the State wants to encourage it.”
  • “We believe that the [local] Board’s authority to impose the condition complained of is preempted by state law, because the Board’s conditions would prohibit [nitrogen] spraying in situations in which the State wants to encourage it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner, Bloom, Alpert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.