Skip to main content

Perdomo v. State

Citations

  • 565 So. 2d 1375
  • 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5435
  • 1990 WL 105514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding evidence of “debatable exculpatory value” should be 17 disclosed, and thus, the State should have disclosed its possession of the defendant’s clothes even though the State believed that the evidence had been stolen
  • finding evidence of “debatable exculpatory value” should be disclosed, and thus, the State should have disclosed its possession of the defendant’s clothes even though the State believed that the evidence had 16 been stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danahy, Frank, Schoonover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.