Skip to main content
· 8/26/1994

Perdomo v. Browner

Citations

  • 862 F. Supp. 226
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12048
  • 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1684
  • 1994 WL 471236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “for questions of foreign law, Rule 44.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which permits expert testimony on such questions, controls” instead of Rule 26(a)(2)
  • explaining that Rule 44.1, not Rule 26(a)(2), controls questions of foreign law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.