Percival v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a sentence imposed may only be required to be served consecutively to an existing sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-08-23· cited 7×
• Burns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-26· cited 3×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-11-12· cited 2×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-22· cited 2×
• Hummell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-09· cited 2×
• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-10· cited 1×
• State v. Duffer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-17· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-18· cited 30×
• Rowe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-26· cited 23×
• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-08· cited 22×
• Teffeteller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-15· cited 11×
• Keel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-31· cited 9×
• Lawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-15· cited 7×