Percival v. BANKERS TRUST COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating minimum-contacts requirement is “not satisfied from a mere ‘effect’ felt by a plaintiff within his or her state of residence”
• stating minimum-contacts requirement is “not satisfied from a mere ‘effect’ felt by a plaintiff within his or her state of residence”
• stating “[t]he minimum contacts requirements demand conduct having to do with the state itself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).