Skip to main content

Perazone v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 128 A.D.2d 15
  • 515 N.Y.S.2d 908
  • 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when the predominant character of a transaction is the sale of goods, it is subject to Article 2 of the UCC, even though the contract covered related services
  • a strict liability cause of action had been extended to retailers for policy reasons
  • “While plaintiff’s complaints alleged that there was a manufacturing defect, he offered no proof that, regardless of the safety of the design of the tractor, there was any impropriety in the manufacture of this particular tractor.”
  • \[e]vide~ce of subsequent remedial measures does not logically prove negligence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.