Skip to main content
· 9/29/2000

Peralta v. Cendant Corp.

Citations

  • 123 F. Supp. 2d 65
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18167
  • 2000 WL 1709080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As any promises in the policy are general statements of adherence to the antidiscrimination laws, standing alone they do not create a separate and independent contractual obligation.”
  • “The language of the anti-harassment policy that plaintiff urges as the basis of his implied contract claim does not indicate that defendant is undertaking any contractual obligations towards the plaintiff[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arterton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.